|

State/Region: Massachusetts
Plan
Name: Massachusetts
BioMap Project
Website: http://www.state.ma.us/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/nhbiomap.htm
General Description:
The Massachusetts BioMap Project seeks to identify and protect
the state's biodiversity. The development of a statewide biodiversity
assessment and maps will facilitate the implementation of the
project. As an assessment tool, the BioMap identifies areas most
in need of protection to conserve the biodiversity of Massachusetts.
Lead Organization:
Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program
Administrative Structure:
Along with the current staff, the Natural Heritage Program
hired fifteen additional personnel to complete the project. They
included ecologists, botanists, zoologists, a project manager,
a data management assistant, and a geographic information systems
(GIS) specialist.
Partners: In addition
to the Natural Heritage Program staff, individuals at the Executive
Office of Environmental Affairs, and the Division of Fisheries
& Wildlife helped on the project. Support and data was also
used from MassGIS, Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, The
Nature Conservancy, and Harvard Forest. Technical data was also
provided by neighboring states' Heritage Programs, including:
New Hampshire, Vermont, New York, Connecticut, and Rhode Island.
Goals: "To
promote strategic land protection by producing a map showing areas
that, if protected, would provide suitable habitat over the long
term for he maximum number of Massachusetts' terrestrial and wetland
plant and animal species and natural communities."
Timeline: In the
spring of 2000, the BioMap project was initiated. The statewide
maps and other products, including a report, technical appendix,
and poster, were completed by the summer of 2001. By the summer
of 2002, the Natural Heritage Program will be sending maps to
local conservation entities, along with summaries of the species
and communities represented in the Core Habitats.
Cost: Approximately
$1.5 million
Funding Sources:
Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
Data: Since 1978,
the Massachusetts'
Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program has been
compiling a database that, as of 2001, has over 7,000 current
(post-1975) records relating to rare or threatened biodiversity.
These site-specific records include the occurrences of rare plant
and animal species along with natural community boundaries. Records
incorporate data on 435 rare species, which include 253 plant
species, 72 vertebrate animal species, and 110 invertebrate animal
species. Also included are "watch-list" species which
have the potential to become endangered. There are also 105 unique
terrestrial, palustrine, and estuarine natural communities tracked
by the Natural Heritage Program.
Out of the 7,000 records, approximately 2,500 plant
populations (occurrences) were evaluated. In turn, botanists and
ecologists analyzed 246 different rare plant species for viability,
along with 750 natural community occurrences. Of the communities
reviewed, 92 different community types were assessed.
Methods: The first
step in producing a useable "BioMap" for individuals,
organizations, and towns to maximize biodiversity conservation
is to define the issue of rarity among species. By using a ranking
system developed by NatureServe, each species is deemed Critically
Imperiled, Imperiled, Vulnerable, Apparently Secure, or, most
commonly, Secure. Once a classification has been constructed for
the rarity of plant and animal species, these results are compared
with state, regional, and national rankings. These "elements
of biodiversity" are called "element occurrences,"
by The Natural Heritage Program. The "element occurrences"
are areas that have practical value for conservation of the species
or community. The occurrences are then ranked from A to D; the
highest probability of long-term persistence to the lowest, respectively.
Three factors are considered in the A to D scale.
"Size" is the first component of the classification,
which includes: (1) the area of occupancy, (2) number of individuals,
(3) population density, and (4) population fluctuation. Next is
the "condition" of the population which considers the:
(1) reproductive success and health; (2) maturity of natural community;
(3) species composition, biological structure, and presence of
exotic species; (4) ecological processes and degree of disturbance;
and (5) physical and chemical factors. Finally the "landscape
context" is evaluated by its: (1) landscape structure, connectivity,
fragmentation, and patchiness and (2) the condition of the surrounding
landscape.
Information to be included on the BioMap must incorporate
a combination of rarity and viability of the species and natural
community. Rare plant populations were represented as single points
on the map due to their relatively immobile nature. Buffers of
330 feet were given around each occurrence of a rare plant, with
currently developed areas clipped out. Wildlife, on the other
hand, were represented by habitat areas that met all requirements
to sustain life: (1) breeding, feeding, resting, and dispersing;
(2) life history; (3) threats; and (4) conservation needs. Aerial
photography along with GIS technology allowed for accurate habitat
boundaries. As for mapping natural community boundaries, field
data, and firsthand knowledge of communities were combined with
GIS technology and color infrared aerial photography.
Results: The elements
of biodiversity were analyzed and a map of the "Core Habitats"
and "Supporting Natural Landscapes" areas were developed.
"Core Habitat" is the "sum total of viable rare
plant habitat, viable rare animal habitat, and viable exemplary
natural communities." The "Supporting Natural Landscapes"
areas are a combination of Core Habitat buffers, large roadless
areas, and undeveloped watersheds. Together, these areas help
maintain the ecological integrity and enhance the "Core Habitat."
Overall, The BioMap identified 2,130,000 acres (42%
of Massachusetts) as important for the long-term conservation
of species and natural communities, of which 1,160,000 acres were
Core Habitat (23% of Massachusetts) and 970,000 acres were Supporting
Natural Landscape (19% of Massachusetts). In all, 246 rare plant
species, 87 invertebrates, and 42 vertebrates were included in
Core Habitat areas. A total of 92 natural communities (43 terrestrial,
41 paustrine, 8 estuarine) from 643 ideal community occurrences
were included as Core Habitat on the BioMap.
Conservation lands, or protected areas, represented
13% of Massachusetts. A total of 660,000 acres of Core Habitat
(450,000 acres) and Supporting Natural Landscape (210,000 acres)
were protected. These areas were supported or managed by a number
of organizations, including: the Department of Environmental Management,
Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Trustees of Reservations,
The Nature Conservancy, and the Massachusetts Audubon Society.
Approximately 69% (1,470,000 acres) of the BioMap's Core Habitat
(710,000 acres) and Supporting Natural Landscape (760,000 acres)
areas were in need of protection.
Of the 13 Ecoregions of Massachusetts, the Boston
Basin was the only region with less than 13% of Core Habitat.
Approximately, 23% of the state was classified as Core Habitat.
Except for the Boston Basin, at least 28% of each ecoregion included
Core Habitat and areas Supporting Natural Landscape.
Strategy/Plan:
When envisioning a sustainable future for Massachusetts, the Natural
Heritage Program developed the BioMap as a tool to help set land
protection priorities. These priorities are meant to facilitate
informed land conservation decisions. The BioMap was not developed
for regulatory purposes. When implementing a conservation strategy,
the Natural Heritage Atlas is the sole source of Estimated Habitat
maps.
Map of Proposed Priority Conservation
Areas: As a community resource, the BioMap should be used
to determine what can be done to protect biodiversity. Areas deemed
Core Habitat should be set with the "highest priority of
protection." These areas have been determined to represent
the most viable and important habitats to conserve. Secondly,
areas Supporting Natural Landscape should be given the next highest
priority. Areas Supporting Natural Landscape that buffer Core
Habitat, connect Core Habitat, connect other areas of Supporting
Natural Landscape, or connect areas of Protected Open Space should
be given higher priorities.

Click here
for larger view of map.
Incentives for Private Landowners:
With respect to the BioMap Project, the Natural Heritage Program
does not address the issue of incentives for private landowners.
However, the Executive
Office of Environmental Affairs- Division of Conservation Services
does provide incentives for landowners. Through the Massachusetts
Conservation Partnership and in cooperation with the USDA Natural
Resources Conservation Service, "these programs include conservation
planning assistance on public and private lands, soil survey reports,
conservation tree seedling sales, training workshops, sediment
& erosion control technical assistance, and conservation education
programs."
Land Acquisition: There
is no formal mechanism in place to purchase areas identified through
the BioMap Project. However, organizations and agencies throughout
the state use the BioMap in their prioritization of land acquisition.
Biodiversity Policy:
The state of Massachusetts does not have a formal biodiversity
policy.
However, Secretary Bob Durand of the Executive
Office of Environmental Affairs has made "biodiversity
and ecosystem protection" a top priority. Secretary Durand's
three objectives include: (1) building public support for protecting
biodiversity in our backyards, neighborhoods, communities, and
watersheds, (2) protecting and restoring ecosystems through land
protection and ecological restoration projects, and (3) promoting
the inclusion of biological conservation and ecosystem protection
considerations in citizen, land use, and government decision making.
Land Protection/Management:
The Massachusetts
Division of Fisheries & Wildlife land protection program's
primary function is acquiring habitats that "protect and
perpetuate ecosystems that contain significant fish and wildlife
resources and to conserve the biological diversity of the state."
In order to further this process the Division of Fisheries &
Wildlife established the Lands Committee. The committee is comprised
of individuals from: Fisheries, Wildlife, and the Natural Heritage
& Endangered Species program; representatives from each district;
along with member of the realty staff from the agencies Boston
office. The committee also advises conservation groups on areas
to protect, as well as helping out towns with their open space
plans.
In 1998 the Cellucci/Swift administration announced
a goal of conserving 200,000 acres of open space in a matter of
ten years. By August 2001, the administration had already conserved
100,000 acres. This was made possible with the cooperation of
municipalities, non-profit land trusts, landowners, increased
acreage in gifts, and increased use of conservation restrictions
to preserve land.
In reference to biodiversity, the Executive
Office of Environmental Affairs has also protected 15,000
habitat acres. These "bioreserves" make up the first
of three landscape-scale projects.
Developed by The Executive Office of Environmental
Affairs in 1994, The Massachusetts
Wetlands Restoration Program is a voluntary program that facilitates
the implementation of wetland restoration projects. Financial
support, technical assistance, and monitoring is provided by The
Massachusetts Wetlands Restoration Program; along with federal,
corporate, and non-profit partners the project is initiated, developed,
and seen through.
The Executive Office of Environmental Affairs developed
the Massachusetts Watershed Initiative. The Watershed Initiative
is a results-oriented program that rehabilitates watersheds by
protecting natural resources and ecosystems. The primary goals
are to improve water quality, restore river flows, protect and
restore habitats, regulate public resource use, improve community
involvement in resource protection, and promote protection/management
of the watershed as a shared resource. Through education, communication,
coordination of state agencies, and improved direction of funding,
the Watershed Initiative is made a reality.
The
Division of Conservation Sciences, under the Executive Office
of Environmental Affairs, incorporates a number of programs that
provide technical and financial assistance to public and private
landowners. Often the success of the programs comes from the cooperation
of the Division and non-profit organizations.
Outreach: Through
Biodiversity Days, The Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
has organized a statewide program that informs, educates, and
allows individuals to take part in conserving the states biodiversity.
The development of "Exploring Biodiversity: A Workbook,"
interested individuals can learn to explore, identify, and document
their discoveries of plant and animal species.
Citizen Science:
The citizens of Massachusetts are encouraged get out and explore
and document their sightings of all species of plants and animals.
The Visible Species of Massachusetts database, under the Executive
Office of Environmental Affairs, accepts data from individuals
and organizations on sightings of all plants and animals. Currently,
the Visible Species database contains approximately 9,824 taxa
collected from over 110,000 occurrences. When rare plant and animal
species are encountered, citizens are urged to contact the Massachusetts
Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage and Endangered
Species Program.
Incentives for Private Landowners:
There are several incentive programs that place short or long-term
restrictions on development while encouraging existing land usage.
Management is an important component in maintaining biodiversity,
and these programs could prove important in conserving both the
BioMap Core Habitat and Supporting Natural Landscape areas.
Invasive Species Control:
Under the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, the
Ecological
Restoration Program addresses invasive species control. Along
with the Upland
Habitat Management Program, MassWildlife's Program is "working
to conserve our common wealth of native flora and fauna by reintroducing
fire in fire-adapted communities, controlling invasive exotic
vegetation, creating and maintaining habitats for declining native
species, and other activities." To sustain biodiversity in
Massachusetts, the ecological management generally states that
the spread of aggressive, non-native or exotic species can choke
out native vegetation. The Natural Heritage Program accepts that
more management of invasive species is necessary.
Linkage to Local Land Use
Planning: The BioMap Project allows for improved conservation
planning and increased coordination among conservation groups
and municipal officials. Local land use planners will also be
able to mesh the BioMap Core Habitat and Surrounding Natural Landscape
with Open
Space and Recreation Plans to protect a particular area.
Another tool for local land use planning, the Community
Preservation Act, provides monies for communities to preserve
Open Space, historic sites, and affordable housing.
Institutional Arrangements:
The Massachusetts
Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Advisory Committee
offers scientific advice on the conservation and protection of
wild plants and animals while promoting the Natural Heritage Fund.
Also, the committee provides funding for biological field research
and inventory as well as other issues concerning the protection
of biodiversity in Massachusetts.
Biodiversity and Land Use
Indicators: None
Monitoring: The Natural
Heritage & Endangered Species Program, along with the
Division of Fisheries & Wildlife, monitors hundreds of species
that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested
in the state. For example, research on rare species and natural
communities generates information about population size, productivity,
and predation.
Highlights & Challenges:
With the completion of the state's first biodiversity assessment
and map, Massachusetts is well poised to conserve the states rare
species and natural communities. The BioMap project allows communities,
land planners, and private landowners to make the necessary first
step in conserving the state's biodiversity. The extensive site-specific
data maintained by the Natural Heritage Program works as a resource
for all conservation efforts.
In order to sustain the biodiversity of Massachusetts,
many non-profit organizations, towns, and individuals must get
involved and work to restore and manage their natural areas. The
BioMap, with effort, will contribute to improved conservation
planning, increased coordination among conservation groups and
municipal officials. Furthermore, the incentives for private landowners
to conserve biodiversity must be addressed.
Products/Publications
- Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental
Affairs. 2001. BioMap: Guiding Land Conservation for Biodiversity
in Massachusetts. Boston, MA. Click
here
- Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental
Affairs. 2000. Exploring Biodiversity: A Workbook. Boston, MA.
Click
here
- Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental
Affairs. 2001. Community Preservation Tool Kit. Boston, MA.
- Massachusetts Department of Fisheries, Wildlife
and Environmental Law Enforcement. BioMap: Guiding Land Conservation
for Biodiversity in Massachusetts.8 January 2002. Click
here
- Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental
Affairs. 2001. BioMap: Guiding Land Conservation for Biodiversity
in Massachusetts (map poster). Boston, MA.
- Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental
Affairs. 2001. BioMap Technical Report. Boston, MA.
Contacts:
Henry Woolsey
Program Coordinator
Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program
Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife
North Drive
Westborough, MA 01581
(508) 792-7270 x162
(508) 792-7821 (fax)
Email: Henry.Woolsey@state.ma.us
Sharon McGregor
Assistant Secretary for Biological Conservation & Ecosystem
Protection
251 Causeway St., Suite 900
Boston, MA 02114
(617) 626-1150
(617) 626-1181 (Fax)
Email: sharon.mcgregor@state.ma.us
Information Sources:
- Massachusetts
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs. 2001. BioMap:
Guiding Land Conservation for Biodiversity in Massachusetts.
Boston, MA.
- Massachusetts
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs. 2000. Exploring
Biodiversity: A Workbook. Boston, MA.
- Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental
Affairs. 2001. Community Preservation Tool Kit. Boston, MA.
- Environmental Law Institute. 2001. Status
of the States: Innovative State Strategies for Biodiversity
Conservation. Washington, DC.
|